CLICK HERE FOR FREE BLOG LAYOUTS, LINK BUTTONS AND MORE! »

Saturday, April 11, 2009

UN reports Canada will continue to play a leading role in immigration until 2050

Wednesday, 25 March 2009

The United Nations has come out with its International Migration Report and Canada will continue to remain the second-biggest net receiver of immigrants until 2050, at 214,000 a year, although it's far behind No. 1: the United States


The UN report places the overall 2050 population of Canada at 42,844,000. Assuming Canada had zero net migration after 2005, its population would go down to 30,772,000. Canada’s economic stability and vitality is therefore dependant on the professional skills of foreign workers and students.

source:http://www.migrationexpert.com/Canada/

Canada's population continues to grow thanks to immigration

Friday, 27 March 2009

New figures show a population increase of 0.19 per cent, the fastest fourth-quarter growth rate since 1992. According to Statistics Canada, international immigration fuelled an increase in Canada's population in the last quarter of 2008, particularly in the western provinces.


"The increased pace in population growth can be explained by a marked increase in net international migration..." Statistics Canada said in a news release.

The increase brings Canada's population to an estimated 33,504,700, up 63,400 from Oct. 1, 2008.

All four provinces west of Ontario posted growth rates higher than the national level, with Alberta posting the biggest increase at 0.60 per cent.

Statistics Canada says Alberta received 5,200 immigrants, a level not seen in a fourth quarter since 1981 and was also boosted by an increase in interprovincial migration.

All of the Atlantic provinces, except for Prince Edward Island, saw an increase in population growth.

The largest demographic growth in the east was in New Brunswick at 0.07 per cent and was due to both interprovincial and international migration.

source:http://www.migrationexpert.com/Canada/Visa/canadian_immigration_news/2009/Apr/0/580/Canada%27s_population_continues_to_grow_thanks_to_immigration

Friday, April 10, 2009

Government of Ontario Announces New Budget

Monday, 30 March 2009

Thanks to the new budget, Ontarians will pay a single 13 per cent sales tax as of July 1, 2010 with most households receiving one-time $1,000 payments and personal tax cuts to ease the pocketbook pain, Finance Minister Dwight Duncan announced.


But the new sales tax, which blends the 8 per cent provincial sales tax with the 5 per cent federal GST, will apply to a host of other things that had not been taxed by Ontario. They include gasoline, heating fuel, tobacco, fast food, gym memberships, newspapers, magazines, haircuts, taxi fares, dry cleaning, legal fees, labour on car repairs and golf green fees.

Under the new tax regimen, selected items traditionally exempted from the 8 per cent PST will continue to only be taxed at the 5 per cent GST rate instead of 13 per cent. These are: children's clothing and shoes, child car seats and boosters, diapers, feminine hygiene products, books, and new homes costing under $400,000.

Business was the biggest budget winner. Starting next year, the corporate income tax rate will drop from 14 per cent to 12 per cent and then to 10 per cent by 2013, which is what the federal Conservatives have been demanding. Small business taxes will be reduced to 4.5 per cent from 5.5 per cent and the rate for manufacturing and processing from 16.7 per cent to 12 per cent and finally to 10 per cent.

In a $108.9 billion spending plan, Duncan also reduced the lowest income tax rate to 5.05 per cent from 6.05. It's designed to help the poorest workers, but 93 per cent of Ontarians will benefit.

There is $27.5 billion in provincial stimulus spending on public works projects to complement $5 billion in previously allocated federal money. That should create or support 300,000 jobs.

Buyers of homes costing $400,000 to $500,000 can claim a proportional tax credit. To offset the fact that taxes will rise on nearly everything from Big Macs to new homes costing more than $500,000, families earning $160,000 or less annually will receive $1,000.

Duncan said the business-friendly single sales tax should save corporate Ontario $500 million a year in paperwork costs.


source: http://www.migrationexpert.com/Canada/Visa/canadian_immigration_news/2009/Apr/0/581/Government_of_Ontario_Announces_New_Budget

Wednesday, April 8, 2009





Alex Beckett grew up in Saint John, N.B., and in his early 20s left the East Coast to attend graduate school in Toronto. He liked the hubbub of the big city and, after graduation, he built a thriving career as a web master and editor. He and his wife Jo, a Halifax girl, bought a house in an up-and-coming Toronto neighborhood and settled down to raise a family. But after their second daughter was born, the Becketts began to experience the oddest sensation — a distinct yearning to return to their Maritime roots. Alex knew that work in his field would not be as easy to find as in Toronto, but both he and Jo pined for a less hectic life and the smell of salt air.

Four years ago, the Becketts finally decided to act on their yearnings. They cashed out of a booming Toronto real estate market and moved to a dream house on the south shore of Nova Scotia, about 45 minutes down the road from Halifax. As the Becketts hoped, the move brought them closer to family. They loved the sense of space and constant presence of the ocean, not to mention the lower real estate prices and relaxed pace of life. But Atlantic Canada wasn't all bliss — among other things, the call for Internet expertise on the East Coast was even less than Alex's modest expectations had foreseen. "I don't think I ever doubted our move," he says, "but I realized that I had underestimated some of the economic differences between what I had grown used to in Toronto and what I was experiencing on the East Coast." If, like the Becketts, you've ever wondered about picking up and moving, you've probably pondered what makes a community a good place to live. Is it climate? Salaries? Real estate?

To be honest, it's probably a bit of each of those factors, plus many more. Our third annual list of Canada's Best Places to Live is designed to help you measure as many different aspects of a community as possible. You can use our findings in several ways. Perhaps you're planning to relocate. Perhaps you're looking to invest in real estate. Maybe you simply want to know how your community stacks up against its neighbors. Whatever your situation, we've got the facts you need.

Canada's best places to liveWe've taken weather into account, of course. Jobs and home prices, too. We've also looked at crime, the availability of doctors, how easy it is to walk or bike to work, and more than a dozen other factors.

Unlike most listings of best cities, our ratings aren't about who has the best scenery, or the best restaurants, or the best beaches. Instead, we've tried to suss out the factors — many of them quiet and unobtrusive — that make a community a good place to live. Where a city ends up on our list is not based upon judges' opinions or popularity polls. It's based on hard numbers. That means our Best Places to Live rankings are the fairest, most unbiased guide you can find to Canadian communities.

This year, we're delighted to provide you with information on 154 communities, up from 123 last year. Thanks to improved sources of data, we are now able to break out metropolitan areas into separate listings for communities of 100,000 or more. So while we previously had to rank all the various communities within the Greater Toronto Area as one unit, we can now separately rate locales such as Mississauga, Markham and Oakville that used to be lumped together under the Toronto label. Similarly, we can break Vancouver down into separate entries for the City of Vancouver, Burnaby, Surrey and other surrounding communities.

To make our listings as useful as possible, we've acted on your suggestions and included additional factors, such as air quality, in our rankings. In all, we looked at 16 indicators for each community. The maximum number of points a community could earn was 104. Here's how we divvied things up.

California dreamin'. The first factor we examined was weather. No surprise there — this is Canada, after all, where summer lasts barely longer than a beer commercial. Weather is our national obsession.

We awarded each city up to 20 points based upon how closely its climate resembled our fantasy — a pristine, unpolluted paradise with mild Mediterranean or Californian temperatures. No place in Canada is likely to be mistaken for Cannes or San Diego, but we assumed that most people prefer dry and moderate to wet and cold. So we began by handing out points for balmy weather — the fewer days below zero, the better. We awarded extra points to places with lots of sunny days. We penalized communities that get showered with rain or blanketed with snow. In years past, we took away points from communities with lots of sweltering days over 30 degrees. Based upon your feedback, we decided to drop that penalty this year. (It seems that many of you think the hotter, the better — and after this past winter, we're inclined to agree.) We added an entirely new category for air quality and looked at both ozone levels and particulate matter to arrive at a rating for each community's breathing supply.

Real estate, real cheap. It's lovely to be able to bask in warm, sunny weather, but it's even nicer if you can do so in your own backyard. In many of Canada's fair-weather locations, real estate costs are suffocating. Is Victoria's mild climate really worth the $500,000 or more that it would take you to buy a three-bedroom bungalow there? To enthusiastic gardeners, perhaps. But to others, the strain of shouldering a huge mortgage simply isn't worth the stress.

To make our listing as realistic as possible, we put ourselves in the position of someone moving to a city and struggling to buy a house. We awarded up to 15 points for affordable housing. Half these points we handed out for low home prices. But since local salary levels vary widely, we fine-tuned our home-affordability ratings by awarding additional points based upon how many years of the average local salary it would take to buy a typical home in each city. Based purely on affordability, it appears that you should immediately move to Yorkton, Sask. Yep, winters may be a tad chilly there, but a typical resident can buy a home for less than two years' salary. In contrast, you would have to bank 7.5 years of the average local salary to buy a house in balmy Vancouver.

Paycheques, please. This is where we venture into territory that most listings of best cities tend to ignore. Simply put, we place a lot of emphasis on how much cash is in people's pockets. We believe prosperous communities tend to be pleasant communities. At the very least, prosperous towns tend to be better places to live than neighborhoods where poverty is hammering at the door. We distributed up to 25 points based upon prosperity indicators. We started by handing out points based upon average household incomes in each community. But big bucks by themselves weren't enough to earn a top score on our prosperity chart. In some of Canada's most well-paid communities, such as the oil boomtown of Fort McMurray, six-figure paycheques are as common as Timbits, but living expenses loom equally large. A huge salary doesn't mean much if you have to pay $400,000 for a townhouse or $100 for a bag of groceries. So we awarded additional points for people's discretionary income — in other words, what proportion of their paycheques they have left at the end of every month after all the bills are paid. It turns out that people in middle-class communities such as Estevan, Sask., and Whitby, Ont., get to keep far more of their paycheques than people in apparently much more prosperous communities such as Vancouver or Toronto.

To further refine our sense of how well people live in each community, we looked for additional indicators of prosperity. Low unemployment was one obvious signal. A less obvious indicator was a high percentage of new cars on the road. Not only do lots of gleaming new vehicles indicate a high level of disposable income, they also suggest that a community is safe enough to make driving a new car a pleasure, rather than an invitation to criminals.

Home safe. Lifestyle factors played a big role in our rankings, accounting for a maximum of 44 points. Communities with low rates of violent crime earned marks. So did communities where a high percentage of folks walk or bike to work, because this indicates a high level of public safety, plus a low level of traffic stress. We applied our stethoscope to each community to see how many doctors per capita reside there. We reasoned that lots of doctors in a community indicate both a high level of health care as well as a generally pleasant place to live, since medical professionals can locate pretty much wherever they choose. We awarded bonus points for amenities, such as a widely used public transit system or a hospital, as well as for enduring civic advantages, such as being a provincial capital or the home of a university. Finally, we decided that one foolproof way to spot a good place to live is to look at where people are actually choosing to move. We didn't want to simply reward rampant growth, however, because while boomtowns boast lots of jobs, they also suffer from the social problems that go with rapid expansion. To get around this problem, we awarded maximum points to communities that have high but not out of control growth. We defined the ideal growth rate as being up to 7.5% a year, two percentage points faster than the national average. A city lost points if it was growing significantly faster or slower than this ideal figure.

And that was that. By the time we had finished factoring in all of our criteria, we had built a monster of a spreadsheet with column after column of data on 154 communities. We had learned a lot about living standards across Canada and about the very best places to live.

First, our winners. It turns out that the absolute best place to live in Canada is our nation's capital. Ottawa blew away the competition, finishing well ahead of second-place Victoria and third-place Fredericton.

Before you write in, let us assure you that we know Ottawa isn't paradise. Its frigid winters drag on too long; its nightlife doesn't pose a challenge to Vegas. But what it does possess is decent ratings across the full spectrum of our criteria. Household income is high. Homes are affordable. When you go shopping in your new car with your high discretionary income, you'll probably bump into one of the city's numerous doctors, who will no doubt be walking to work. While it didn't finish higher than 19th in any individual category, Ottawa was consistently in the top third of communities, no matter what factor we examined. And that was enough to earn it top spot, with 75 out of a possible 104 points.

Victoria, which finished No. 2 with 67 points, did things differently. While Ottawa achieved consistently decent scores on all our measurements but wasn't outstanding in anything, Victoria was a mixture of extremes, scoring very high for warm weather and lots of doctors, but very low for affordable housing and discretionary income. Fredericton, with 66 points, was Victoria's mirror image — the New Brunswick city scored extremely high on affordable housing and discretionary income, but low on doctors and weather. The lesson here? Cities can find different ways to be excellent. You have to find the place that matches your own needs. As Alex Beckett will tell you, the more research you do on a community, the better prepared you will be for a move. Four years after leaving Toronto (No. 51 in our ranking), he and his family are firmly rooted in the Halifax area (No. 9). But looking back, he realizes that his first year could have been a lot easier if he had investigated salary and employment prospects before moving. He's now working in Halifax for a public-service employer as a web master, but is earning about 40% less than the equivalent job in Toronto would pay. "Salaries are simply a lot lower in Nova Scotia than I expected, at least for what I do," he says. "Moving from downtown Toronto to rural Nova Scotia is a huge move — bigger than I had expected." Overall, though, he's delighted. He and his wife purchased an oceanside house with a million-dollar view for a price that wouldn't cover a semi-detached fixer-upper in downtown Toronto. They never have to worry about locking their doors at night. Their three daughters aren't obsessed with having the latest fashions or most expensive designer clothes. "It's been a great move for us," he says. "I lead a far more relaxed life than I ever did in downtown Toronto." If you're contemplating your own move, start by checking out our Best Places to Live listing. Who knows? You, too, may find that paradise is just down the road.

http://list.canadianbusiness.com/rankings/bestplacestolive/2008/prosperity/Default.aspx?sub=n1&df=bestcities&sp2=2&sc1=6&d1=a

Housing Prices

.

2008 Housing Prices

Type

Price

Qualifying Household Income*

Standard Two-Storey

$521,400 $127,100

Detached Bungalow

$436,400 $106,300

Townhouse

$383,400 $92,000

Condo

$297,300 $73,100

* Based on a 25% down payment and a 25-year mortgage loan at a five-year fixed rate -excluding maintenance fees.
Source: RBC. December, 2008.

Date

Average House Price

2008 Forecast

$380,000

2009 Projected

$364,800

Source: Royal LePage. 2009.

http://www.canadaimmigrants.com/Torontoliving

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Ontario Ministry of Education









This is a great site containing resources and information about publicly funded education system all the way from preschool to university.

Ontario Ministry of Education plans to promote a strong, vibrant, publicly funded education system that is focused on three goals:

  • High levels of student achievement
  • Reduced gaps in student achievement
  • High levels of public confidence in public education
http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/sbinfo/